Patient Ham B makes a compelling argument regarding their preeminence. / Delve further into the teamwork exhibited by patient Ham B and their favorite partner. / Delusions of grandeur continue to plague patient H’s day to day outlook. / Review with patient H the differences between addiction, predilection and allocation. / Though I’m not in competition with anyone, hard to dispute patient’s assertion. / Patient’s insecurities regarding the nature of their being bubble up in another non sequitur. / Suggestions that patient is somehow inferior to other cuts of meat continues to bring patient to a boil. / Patient loses focus briefly during session in a way that isn’t uncommon or particularly notable. / See if patient is able to provide any irrefutable proof of claims of pre-existence. / Clarify patient’s implication that they were in tact in perhaps unknown times and dimensions.
See COMPLETE STRIPS W/ FOLLOW-UP FRAMES at
Therapy Dog Tails:
https://substack.com/profile/132258040-wd-haverstock?utm_source=user-menu
MOST RECENT TWO WEEKS ALWAYS FREE!